No dataset is perfect, but many people (including RPJ) acknowledge that many of these dollar figures may actually be UNDER-estimates of how bad things are. Cancelling something isn't the solution when you want to fix it.
Fake news . The Marxists have destroyed any legitimacy the scientific community had by polluting their fields .
A simple look at how hurricanes were supposedly tracked and compared to a time when we tracked hurricanes by looking at the horizon and then tying bogus increases to their favorite cash cow —— climate change .
No hurricanes haven’t increased but YES damages and life losses from natural disasters have plummeted dramatically despite increases in population .
The real problem with NOAA’s BDD was methodology. You can follow all of the links here
https://rogerpielkejr.substack.com/p/rip-noaas-billion-dollar-disasters?utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true
It could very well and to good effect be re-created in a more robust way as RPJ describes.
There’s no benefit to climate action with the use of a PR tool that is so easily critiqued.
No dataset is perfect, but many people (including RPJ) acknowledge that many of these dollar figures may actually be UNDER-estimates of how bad things are. Cancelling something isn't the solution when you want to fix it.
I agree there was a constructive solution to the methodological issues and that almost certainly this is not the government willing to implement it.
Fake news . The Marxists have destroyed any legitimacy the scientific community had by polluting their fields .
A simple look at how hurricanes were supposedly tracked and compared to a time when we tracked hurricanes by looking at the horizon and then tying bogus increases to their favorite cash cow —— climate change .
No hurricanes haven’t increased but YES damages and life losses from natural disasters have plummeted dramatically despite increases in population .
So no.